Late 2016 brought a wave of geopolitical uncertainty with a series of shocks, first with the UK’s decision to leave the EU, then the election of Donald Trump as President of the US. This volatility continued over 2017 through the NAFTA renegotiations and trade wars and has crept into 2018 with the Mexican presidential elections won by wildcard candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Even though mining thrives on uncertainty, secondary factors such as regulatory and trade clarity are affecting profitability for miners. Mexico Mining Review asked industry leaders what effects have been felt so far and what are they doing to protect themselves against future shocks.
I personally think that the industry is pretty well-positioned. I would say that in 2011, when metals prices were at their peak, the industry got rather lazy. But then as prices for silver and gold declined over the ensuing years, the industry was forced to address some of those areas where it was a little bloated. Costs were reduced, marginal mines were either shut down or sold and balance sheets were really improved. In 2011, companies were pursuing growth at all costs without financial discipline in terms of capital allocation and ROI. But now I think the industry has a much sharper focus on true profitability and returns to shareholders. I feel the industry now is in a much better position. Silver and gold prices have stabilized and strengthened. US$1,350 oz is a very attractive price for the industry and underpinning this is exchange rate volatility, debt levels, geopolitics and supply set to further decline.
The new administration should take into consideration how countries like Australia have found a model that works for companies, the environment and the communities that live near the mine operations and extraction processes. Prices are created by global demand and companies need to make sure their costs are as low as possible and productivity as high as possible to withstand any type of volatility. Technology, best practices and environmental and community considerations are all necessary elements for a longer term profitable and sustainable industry. Australia and New Zealand are leaders in these areas. We believe that Mexico can learn from the sharing of such programs as the industry moves forward.
I cannot predict gold prices, which is why we try to work with quality projects that can withstand the price movements. When we acquire projects, we factor in the volatility of the metal price for that reason – gold prices are unpredictable. Right now, we are in cash conservation mode until there is a clear picture of the next president’s and the new governor of Veracruz’s goals for the industry, but we will reinitiate operations when the timing is right. But there is a big change going on in Europe and Canada, where there are rumblings of big banks cutting back on their research platforms. That will be a shakeup for the market, and potentially the BIVA has arrived at an opportune time.
I think NAFTA is a very relevant issue to consider. Politically the treaty is useful as it allows us to access the US and Canadian markets but renegotiations need to consider that Mexico does not have the same living conditions as the US or Canada. We must strive to gradually diminish the gap between NAFTA members. It must be gradual because many foreign investors chose to come to Mexico for the low wages, so we cannot suddenly increase them to regional parity as this could impact investment in the country. We cannot risk bringing about more unemployment. Also, the higher the profits we make, the more income tax increases, which can lead to high inflation rates.
This is an exclusive preview of the 2020 edition of Mexico Mining Review. If you want to get all the information, plus other relevant insights regarding this industry, pre-order your copy of Mexico Mining Review or access our digital copy.